Archive for May, 2015

The Coalition Government: A Catalogue of Damage

Posted: May 28, 2015 by joshuachristian19691 in Uncategorized

I found this earlier on Youtube under Libertarian Socialist Rants. It is very interesting and entertaining to watch, in order to figure out and expose everything that this government has done and is about to do.


Here is the youtube video before it vanishes.



A wet start to May

Posted: May 19, 2015 by rainbowwarriorlizzie in Uncategorized

Official blog of the Met Office news team

It has been a wet start to May with the UK already having seen more than its normal full-month rainfall after just 17 days.

Early Met Office figures up to the 17th of the month show the UK has had 74.1mm of rain – which is just over the full-month May average of 70.0mm.

Looking at individual countries – Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland have all had more than their full month average, while England is just under.

Much of this rain fell in the first 10 days of the month, with relatively less rainfall since then. It’s far too early to say where the month’s rainfall will end up, but at this stage it looks unlikely that we’d see any records.

It has also been colder than average so far with a UK mean temperature of 9.2C, which is 1.2C below the full-month average.

As May is a…

View original post 104 more words


 The Friends of the Library of Birmingham has decided to call a demonstration on Saturday June 13th. It will be to oppose the drastic cuts to the LoB in terms of its opening hours, staff cuts and restrictions on the services it has been offering. It will assemble at the Waterstones book shop at the bottom of New Street at 12 noon and then march up New Street for a rally at the Council House at 1pm.

Lob occupation 016

 The “Friends” group has decided to take this course of action for several reasons.
 Firstly, the consultation exercise over the 2015 Council budget showed massive support for the LoB, far and away more than for any other area of service (50% of all respondents, compared to 29% for adult social services, and a massive 78% rejecting any cut to this one-and-a-half-year-old library). The results of the consultation were ignored and the cuts went…

View original post 210 more words

” The responses we received from prospective parliamentary candidates (PPCs) contained some ‘common themes’ when they were opposing the NHS (Reinstatement) Bill ( 

We’ve looked at these and put together some rebuttals, which we think are useful when arguing the point.


“In my view, giving operational control for the day-to-day

running of services to doctors was the right decision. The

Government’s health reforms have focused on the role of

the GP, believing that they are best placed to commission

local health services, as they have the best understanding

of local needs.”


Before the Bill took effect

* GPs themselves were opposed to this supposed delegation of “operational control”(1)  and few GPs had the “enthusiasm, time or expertise to take on the work”(1,2)

* Three-quarters of respondents to a poll of members of RCG in 2012 said they thought it appropriate to seek the withdrawal of the bill. (1)

* The Royal College of GPs called for the Prime Minister to scrap the Health and Social Care Bill in 2012, branding it “damaging, unnecessary and expensive”. (1)

* President of the RCGP at the time Care Gerada said that the bill would “cause irreparable damage to patient care and jeopardise the NHS”. (1)

* In her final keynote speech to her college Gerada also said “in 10 years’ time, I predict, the NHS Act [HSCA] will be viewed as one of the historic misjudgements of all time”. (2)

After the Bill took effect

* GP’s now make up less than half of CCG board members which means GP’s are in the minority when it comes to voting. (2)  Much of the day-to-day work of CCGs is done by managers or commissioning support units. (2)

* Many GPs are already leaving their roles on CCGs due to general loss of interest as they realise that they don’t have much influence in decision making. (2)

* Of the GPs who had no formal role in CCGs, only 38% felt their views were reflected in CCG decisions. (3)

* While funding is decided nationally it is up to CCGs to find ways of saving money by cutting services and rationing care all the while the budget allocated to primary care has been reducing year after year. (2)  At the same time GPs are discouraged by CCGs to refer to specialist/hospitals to save costs, (2) Jeremy Hunt threatens to name and shame GPs who miss cancers. (4) (Cancer usually needs referral to secondary care (a “specialist”) for diagnosis!)

* Cuts decided by CCGs can go ahead even if local GPs oppose them, as well the case for Lewisham A&E. (2)  Jeremy Hunt pushed to take power away from GPs even further when he lost the Lewisham case by pushing through Cause 119 in the Care Act to allow a Special Administrator the power to close down hospitals with no input from the local GPs or hospital consultants.

* One poll showed that 73% of GPs believe they have been set up  to take the blame for rationing health care. (5)

* There has been an unprecedented collapse in morale in general practice with recent polls showing more than a third of GP’s considering retirement in the next 5 years and almost a third considering moving to part time. (6)  Excessive workload and not enough time with patients has been cited as reasons for this. (6)

* According to Dr Maureen Baker (current chair of the RCGP) general practice is “on the brink of extinction”. (7)

“The NHS under the current government is the best in the World” (Conservatives)

“A Commonwealth Fund comparative report which looked

into the performance of different national health systems

recently concluded that the NHS, under this Government,

is the best health service in the world, which is very

welcome news.”


* In the Commonwealth Fund report the UK indeed ranks first overall, scoring highest on  quality of care, access to care (including cost related) and efficiency. (8)

* However, this report  surveys conducted in 2011, 2011, and 2013 and the Health and Social Care Act (HSCA) came into power in April 2013 and so it cannot be seen as a reflection of the current government’s policies on the NHS and most notably not a reflection of the impact of HSCA itself.

* This whoever should be seen as a testament to an NHS that was performing well when the conservative government took power which begs the question of why did Lansley propose these needless reforms in the first place?

King’s fund report which came out this year which analysed the NHS under this government highlighted in fact that “The reforms (HSCA) took rime and attention away from the work needed to maintain the improvements in care achieved in the previous decade within the funding provided by the government.” (9)


“Labour is committed to bringing forward a bill to repeal

the Tories’ damaging changes to the NHS…Labour’s repeal

plan will ensure that the Secretary of State has a duty to

provide a comprehensive national service which is free at

the point of need, that private patients are not put before

NHS patients, and that the conflicts of interests the Act has

created are tackled. We will also ensure that the Secretary

of State is able to give directions to the NHS.”


The Labour Party’s private member’s Bill which was intended to overturn key parts of the HSCA (the Efford Bill) could not repeal the HSCA for several reasons:

* It does not re-establish the Secretary of state’s legal duty to “provide national health services in England”. Clause 1 of the Bill states “duty to exercise functions to secure provision” and Clause 3 states “duty to arrange provision” both of which were present before the HSCA. This maintains the purchaser-provider split and competition at the CCG and Foundation trust level”. (10)

* The Bill refers to the NHS as delivering services of “general economic interest” and imposes this duty on the Secretary of State. This is a deferral to EU laws of competition although the EU commission itself refers to public hospital services/ National Health Service as services of non-economic interest. (10)

* The Bill does not stop the requirement imposed by the 2012 HSCA to transform all NHS trusts into NHS foundation trusts that would be subject to merger, closure or takeover by private companies should they fail to do so. (10)

* It was stopped by filibustering Tories in its committee stage before Parliament was dissolved. It now cannot become law. Another Conservative majority or coalition government will do the same thing to any Bill intended to overturn the HSCA.

“We need to keep commissioning/purchaser provider split for non-routine care to relieve pressure on the NHS” (Labour)

“Labour’s Shadow Health Secretary Andy Burnham has

stated that a future Labour Government would retain a

care commissioning system – the so-called purchaser-

provider split that Peter Roderick and Allyson Pollock’s NHS

Reinstatement Bill seeks to abolish – but, crucially, with

the NHS regaining its status as preferred provider. This

model will give the NHS the certainty to plan and improve

services, while ensuring that, at times of high demand,

certain routine operations can be provided by the third or

private sectors, so as to ensure that targets – such as on

waiting times – are met.”


The Reinstatement Bill is clear in stating that healthcare can be provided by other parties apart from the NHS. It doesn’t ‘ban’ them. What it does is restore the priority that private providers are allowed to provide healthcare with NHS money only  if there is no  alternative within the NHS. It brings to an end the practice of NHS organisations to ‘complete’ with private providers and each  wasting public money. This was never an appropriate model for efficient healthcare, and the purchaser-provider split is  same model of marketization. It has no place in the NHS and it is wasteful. The cost of the internal. (11)

“HSCA hasn’t encouraged competition” (Conservatives)

“There are no new competition provisions in the Health and

Social Care Act – it simply codifies practices the old PCTs

were obliged to follow under European Law.”


* Section 75 of the HSCA stipulates that CCGs have to prove that only a single provider can run a service or they must put out to tender. 2 it also prohibits commissioners from engaging in anti-competitive behaviour. (2)

* There have been examples of legal action taken against a CCG for anti-competitive behaviour such as the case of a CCG in  Blackpool being sued by private company Spire which owned the local private hospital for not tendering hospital services to them. Even though Spire lost this case, Monitor still recommended that in the future the CCG should “promote choice”. (2)

* This legal exercise intimidates CCGD and wastes funds that could be used for providing patient services in the NHS. (2)

* Contracts are increasingly being won by providers. In an analysis of 3494 contracts awarded between April 2013 and August 2014, non-NHS providers (including private sector, voluntary sector, and other providers) has secured 45% of contracts awarded since April 2013 while 55% went to NHS. (11)

* Clive Peedall:  “The clever thing they said was, ‘We’ve made it illegal to favour the private sector’ – whereas actually what they did was make it illegal to favour the NHS.” (11)


Guardian (2012) ‘Royal College of GPs calls for David Cameron to scrap health bill; 3 February. Available at

2 Davis J., Lister, J. and Wrigley, D. (2015) NHS For Sale, London: Merlin Press.

3 Naylor, C. et al.(2013) Clinical Commissioning Groups: Supporting improvement in general practice? London: The King’s Fund and Nuffield Trust. Available at:

4 Aziz, Z. (2014) ‘Jeremy Hunt’s plan to shame GPs with low cancer referrals is not the answer; Guardian, 8 July. Available at:

5 GP (2013) ‘What GPs really think about CCGs; 1212 April. Available at:

6 Triggle, N. (2015) ‘GP services face “retirement crisis” , BBC News, 15 April [online]. Available at:

7 Royal College of General Practitioners (2014) ‘Dr Maureen Baker Chair of RCGP Annual Conference Speech’, 15 April. Available at:

8 Davis, K., Stremikis, K., Squires, D and Schoen, C. (2014) ‘Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, 2014 Update: How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally’. The Commonwealth Fund. Available at:

9 Appleby, J., Baird, B., Thompson, J. and Jabbal, J. (2015) ‘The NHS under the coalition government; The King’s Fund, 26 March. Available at:

10 Houses of Parliament (2015) ‘National Health Service (Amended Duties and Powers) Bill 2014-15; 2014 p. Available at: powers.html

11 British Medical Journal, (2014) ‘A third of NHS contracts awarded since health act have gone to private sector, BMJ investigation shows; British Medical Journal,349(dec10 1):g7606-g7606.

12 Calum, P. (2014) ‘At what cost? Paying the price for the market in the English NHS; Center for Health and the Public Interest. Available at:\ton-pdf

Beastrabban\'s Weblog

Earlier today I posted up an article about an obsolete term I’d found in the Dictionary of Historical Slang, which I thought pretty accurately described the current head of the Department for Work and Pensions. This was ‘Gentleman Ranker’, which referred to ‘a broken gentleman, serving in the ranks of the army’. In other words, this was a middle or upper class man, who had lost his money. Unable to buy a commission, he was forced to serve in the ranks as an ordinary squaddie.

This indeed suits Iain Duncan Smith, as unfortunately, although he has retained his wealth and landed property, he is rumoured to have been Returned To Unit after failing to pass the officers’ exams at Sandhurst.

Since I posted it, I got this comment from Maxwell 1957. He says that there’s another obsolete term, ‘Wancel’, which also aptly describes IDS. This is 18th century slang…

View original post 414 more words

Gramcake, 15p (GLUTEN-FREE) (VEGAN)

Posted: May 14, 2015 by rainbowwarriorlizzie in Uncategorized

Cooking on a Bootstrap

Some people say socca, some say farinata; I decided to christen my breakfast this morning ‘gramcake’ – a pancake made with gram flour and little else. I can’t believe it’s taken me so long to crack into my bag of gram flour, seeing it ticks all of my culinary boxes – it’s high in protein, versatile, and I can bake with it! All of which make me very happy indeed. This simple recipe made for a very satisfying breakfast – you can amend the spices and flavours to whatever you like, as the base is slightly sweet and nutty, so will complement all manner of things. I opted for spice this morning, because chilli and cumin are great any time of day, and I’m more of a savoury than sweet girl myself.

Serves 1, easily doubled or tripled or multiplied by 87:
50g gram flour, 7p (KTC gram flour £1.30/1kg)

View original post 334 more words

Street Democracy - where it should reach - Our Streets!

The Tories are behaving like fiends from a damned toxic ring, frantically mad on removing our human rights to unleash total police state domination in one spontaneous explosion of hideous horror.
To legalise oppression, a police state society of a crushing dynamic force of control will shatter home towns, our family lives and our dignity not spared.
Our lives under a ‘gulag’ mentality, miserable, laborious and hard under a ‘Tory Fourth Reich’ of gut wrenching death dealing policies that is no longer conspiracy and never was.
Bit by bit they have taken our rights away under the illusion of their saintly facade. This is a manufactured dehumanisation programme and the death of civic virtue.
We must be convulsed in immeasurable anger and indescribable frustration at the wilful arrogance of these elite rulers of concentrated wealth insistent upon out right supremacy over us.
They are imposing…

View original post 177 more words